Article

The recruiter call is often the first real test of how you'll navigate your ability profile in the hiring process. Some recruiters are trained in inclusive hiring. Many are not. Some will ask legal, thoughtful questions. Some will ask things that are legally questionable or just awkward.

Your job is to be prepared for all of it — so that no recruiter question, however clumsily phrased, can derail a conversation you deserve to win.

The Disclosure Decision: A Framework for Recruiter Conversations

Before the scripts, the framework. Disclosure of your ability profile is your choice — not a requirement. In India, under the RPWD Act 2016, you are not legally obligated to disclose any aspect of your ability profile unless your role requires specific medical fitness certification (certain government roles, aviation, defence).

When to consider disclosing during recruitment:

• You're applying through IMAbled or a platform where disclosure is part of the ability-matching process (and works in your favour)
• Your ability profile is apparent and you'd prefer to address it proactively rather than have it surface awkwardly
• You need specific accommodations for the interview itself and disclosure is necessary to request them
• The employer has a stated inclusive hiring programme and disclosure opens additional pathways

When to consider not disclosing at the recruiter stage:

• Your ability profile has no practical impact on the role
• You want the hiring decision made on your qualifications alone
• The recruiter is third-party/agency and you prefer to disclose directly to the company

Either choice is valid. What matters is that it's a conscious, strategic decision — not a reaction made under pressure.

The 8 Most Common Recruiter Questions — And How to Handle Each

Question 1: "Our profile shows you applied under the differently-abled category. Can you tell me more about your situation?"

What's happening: The recruiter is following a script and may not know better phrasing.
Your response: Take control of the framing immediately.

"Yes — I applied under that category because I'm a specially-abled professional. Specifically, [one-sentence factual description]. In a professional context, [what you can do fully]. The one workplace accommodation that helps me work at my best is [specific request]. Happy to provide any documentation your team needs. Should we continue to the role itself?"

That last sentence is key — it signals that you've answered the question and are ready to move on to what matters: your qualifications.

Question 2: "Are you able to handle the demands of this role?"

What's happening: The recruiter is voicing an assumption they haven't examined.
Your response:

"Absolutely. Here's what I've been doing in [similar role or context] — [specific example with result]. I've managed [comparable demands] before and delivered [specific outcome]. The role description maps closely to what I've done. Is there a specific aspect of the role you'd like me to address?"

Don't get defensive. Demonstrate capability with specifics.

Question 3: "Our office is on the third floor and we don't have a lift. Will that be an issue?"

What's happening: A genuine operational concern — probably indicating a company that hasn't thought deeply about inclusion.
Your response:

"I appreciate you raising that. [If applicable: I use a wheelchair / require elevator access] — so yes, I would need accessible premises to work there. I'd want to understand whether there are alternative arrangements possible, or whether this role might have a hybrid or remote component. What flexibility does the team have?"

If the building is genuinely inaccessible and they have no flexibility — that's important information. A company whose office is physically inaccessible and unwilling to accommodate is giving you a preview of how they'll handle other inclusion matters.

Question 4: "Will you be able to travel for this role?"

Your response (if you can travel):
"Yes, travel is fine. Is there any specific travel pattern I should know about — frequency, destinations?"

Your response (if travel requires accommodation):
"I can travel. I'd need to plan logistics with a bit of advance notice to ensure accessible transport and accommodation. Is that kind of advance notice typically available for travel in this role?"

Question 5: "What is your condition exactly?"

What's happening: Medical curiosity that crosses a professional boundary — likely from a recruiter who hasn't been trained on appropriate questions.
Your response:

"I prefer to describe what I bring to the role rather than going into medical specifics — those aren't really relevant to the position. What I can tell you is [what you can do, how you work, what accommodations you need if any]. Does that answer your question?"

This is a polite but firm boundary. You're not obligated to provide a medical history to a recruiter.

Question 6: "Have you worked in a mainstream company before?"

What's happening: The recruiter is trying to gauge whether you have corporate experience — often a coded way of asking whether you've managed in non-supported environments.
Your response:

"Yes — [specific company or context where you've worked in a standard corporate environment]. I've [specific example of what you achieved there]. Is there a particular aspect of the environment here you'd like to know more about?"

Question 7: "Other candidates don't need [accommodation]. Why should we provide it for you?"

What's happening: Resistance to accommodation — often coming from a recruiter who sees it as a cost rather than an investment.
Your response:

"Reasonable accommodation is a legal requirement under the RPWD Act 2016, and it's also standard practice at most leading employers. What I'm asking for is [specific, reasonable thing — assistive software / accessible desk / remote option]. This is a modest investment that enables me to deliver [full professional output]. Most inclusive employers have found that the return on this investment is significant. Would it help if I shared information about the accommodation and what it requires on your end?"

You've cited the law, named the specific accommodation, framed it as investment not cost, and offered to educate. That's a complete, professional response.

Question 8: "Are you sure you can handle the pressure here?"

Your response:
"Based on [specific high-pressure situation you've navigated successfully — name it specifically], yes. I perform well under pressure. What does 'pressure' typically look like in this role?"

You've answered with evidence, not reassurance. And you've turned it into a question that gathers more information about the role — which is exactly what a confident candidate does.

After the Recruiter Call: What to Note

After every recruiter call, take 5 minutes to note:

• Did they ask any questions you couldn't answer confidently? Prepare better for next time.
• Were they respectful and informed about inclusion? This is signal about the company's culture.
• Did you feel heard or talked at? Trust your read — it's usually accurate.

Recruiter calls are two-way assessments. You are evaluating them as much as they are evaluating you.

Your Action Step

Practise the three responses you find most challenging out loud — ideally with a friend, mentor, or by recording yourself. Hearing your own voice deliver these answers confidently changes how you feel in the actual call. Preparation is the difference between a recruiter conversation that derails your confidence and one that ends with them moving you forward.